Marine reserves can't do it all: Sea otters vs. r...( California's sea otters and red abalone...)

"We conclude that coastal marine protected areas off California cannot enhance abalone fisheries if...they also contain sea otters, " say Samantha Fanshawe, who did this work while at the University of California at Santa Cruz, and is now at the U.K.'s Marine Conservation Society; Glenn VanBlaricom of the University of Washington in Seattle; and Alice Shelly of TerraStat Consulting Group in Seattle, Washington, in the February issue of Conservation Biology.

California's red abalone population is so low that all of the commercial fisheries and all but one of the recreational fisheries are closed. Similarly, California's sea otter population is at roughly 2,000 and is dropping by about 1-2% each year. While the state has two marine reserves that protect the otters from people, there are none that protect the abalone from otters.

To see if reserves can both protect the sea otters and rebuild the red abalone fisheries, Fanshawe and her colleagues studied red abalone at six sites, four with and two without sea otters. The sites with otters were off Monterey County and the sites without otters were off Sonoma County; abalone harvesting is prohibited at all six of the sites. The researchers determined the abundance and size of red abalone at two depth zones: "shallow" (about 10-15 feet) and "deep" (about 25-33 feet). Sea otters can dive as deep as 330 feet and so can easily reach abalone on both zones.

Fanshawe and her colleagues found that red abalone were far more abundant at the sites without sea otters: there were about seven times more of the abalone in the "deep" zones (15.6 vs. 2.2 per study plot), and nearly 20 times more in the "shallow" zones (17.5 vs. 0.9 per study plot). In addition, the abalone were an average of nearly two times bigge
'"/>

Contact: Samantha Fanshawe
sam@mcsuk.org
44-198-956-6017
Society for Conservation Biology
28-Jan-2003