Policy review in Science calls for Bush Administration to protect w...( Authors of the Policy Forum in the Marc...)

Authors of the Policy Forum in the March 26th issue of the international journal Science call for the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to protect wild salmon stocks whose status under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is now in jeopardy as a result of legal and political pressures from landowners and timber interests. A substantial fraction of the salmon populations currently listed under the Endangered Species Act in the Northwest are in immediate danger of being delisted not because they are recovering but because their status and presence potentially blocks development.

A U.S. District Court decision puts into question the endangered status of all wild Oregon coho salmon, saying that hatchery fish could be included with endangered wild salmon, thus opening the legal door to delisting the wild populations. As a consequence, there are also petitions to delist 15 evolutionarily significant populations of wild salmon in Oregon, California, Idaho and Washington. Meanwhile, NMFS has been drafting criteria for including or excluding hatchery fish in a population, and has a March 31st deadline for their review of eight such salmon populations. Including hatchery fish with endangered wild salmon would create the legal possibility of maintaining a stock solely through hatcheries.

However six of the world's leading ecologists conclude that fish produced in hatcheries cannot be counted on to save wild salmon. The government appointed team of academic scientists including Robert Paine of the University of Washington, Ransom Myers of Dalhousie University, Simon Levin of Princeton University, Russell Lande of the University of California at San Diego, Frances James of Florida State University and William Murdoch of University of California at Santa Barbara, were requested to serve as an external review committee for the recovery of Pacific salmon. Their independent findings were presented to NMFS, but the group was told that their conclusions regarding
'"/>

Contact: Ransom Myers
Ransom.Myers@Dal.Ca
902-494-1755
SeaWeb
25-Mar-2004

Page: 1 2 3 4
Related biology news :

1. Research news from Tufts University, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy: February 2004
2. McGill Centre for Intellectual Property Policy receives $3 million SSHRC Grant
3. Center for Health Law and Policy presents program on bioterrorism measures and civil liberties
4. When Media, Science and Public Policy Collide: The Case of Food and Biotechnology
5. Society For Conservation Biology 1999 Annual Meeting: Integrating Policy And Science In Conservation Biology
6. Science Article Criticizes Federal Policy Regarding Lead Exposure And Childrens Health
7. Focus On The Bay: Pfiesteria And The Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem -- Symposia At Annual Meeting To Examine Science Policy On Pfiesteria And The Bay
8. Consumer-Oriented Environmental Policy Unsuccessful
9. Guidelines For Next Generation Of Environmental Policy
10. EPAs Plant-Pesticide Policy Threatens To Stifle Development Of Pesticide Alternatives And International Trade
11. MSU group reviews Berkeley venture into brave new science funding world