There's a scholarly debate brewing about whether pre-Columbian Amazonian populations settled in large numbers across Amazonia and created the modern forest setting that many conservationists take to be natural.'
This view has become fashionable among many archaeologists and anthropologists, and is challenged in a recent paper from Dr. Mark Bush of the Florida Institute of Technology. The findings of Bushs research may rekindle a debate has major implications for land use and policy-setting in the rain forest.
"We don't contradict that there were major settlements in key areas flanking the Amazon Channel -- there could have been millions of people living there," says Mark Bush, a British-born paleo-ecologist who travels to extremely remote rain forest locations to collect core samples from ancient lakes. He then analyzes those samples for pollen and charcoal and thus is able to conclude with a high degree of accuracy the extent of human settlement in that region.
"What we do say is that when you start to look away from known settlements, you may see very long-term local use," he says. "These people didn't stray very far from home, or from local bodies of water for several thousands of years. We looked at clusters of lakes and landscapes where people lived, and asked, did they leave their homesite to farm around other nearby lakes? No they didn't. These findings argue for a very localized use of Amazonian forest resources outside the main, known, archaeological areas."
Bush says the evidence comes from a geographically diverse area: three districts, each with 3 (in two cases) or four lakes.
"In each we have one lake occupied and used, and the others little used
or not used at all," he says. "So this is a total of 10 lakes that
provide three separate instances -- one in Brazil, one in Ecuador and
one in Peru, where there is evidence of long, continuous occupation
Contact: karen Rhine
Florida Institute of Technology