In September, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the HIV/AIDS epidemic a global health emergency requiring a rapid scaled-up treatment response, but researchers in this week's BMJ argue that governments should go one step further and treat it as a disaster.
In fact, governments should be encouraged and rewarded for adopting a disaster response to HIV and AIDS, they say.
Declaring a state of emergency in a country plagued by HIV and AIDS could speed up the response. It would overcome barriers to co-operation and facilitate access to cheaper drugs. Resources could also be better co-ordinated, eliminating duplication and ensuring everyone is working to the same goal.
However, declaring a state of emergency forces the government to publicly admit that their country is in a vulnerable condition, which may lead to strained international trade ties, add the authors.
"We hope, however, that our suggestions will provide a basis for generating new thinking and a better co-ordinated, more effective and timely response to the mounting HIV/AIDS crisis," they conclude.
Page: 1 Related medicine news :1
Contact: Emma Dickinson
BMJ-British Medical Journal
. US syphilis epidemics not driven by increases in unsafe sex say researchers2
. Likelihood of a large vCJD epidemic remains small claim researchers3
. Hepatitis C at epidemic levels among young injectors in London4
. Growing epidemic of wet AMD ushers in new era in treatment of the disease5
. Lung cancer in women is a 21st century epidemic6
. Article examines reasons contributing to epidemic of lung cancer in U.S. women7
. Vitamin D deficiency emerges as new epidemic8
. UCLA AIDS Institute scientists show antiretroviral drugs can eradicate AIDS epidemic9
. Sexually transmitted diseases, malaria, and tuberculosis and the HIV-1/AIDS epidemic in Africa10
. Senior citizen drinking problems labeled invisible epidemic11
. HIV/AIDS education for women in jail could reduce epidemic nationally