But international medical ethics specialists (appendix 1) who evaluated the performance of one large Toronto area hospital during last year's SARS outbreak conclude that procedural requirements, particularly fair and ethical priority-setting, are even more important in the midst of a crisis.
"Hospitals operate at their best when staff and patients trust the process," says Doug Martin, PhD, who led the study for the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics (JCB). "But the SARS outbreak raised questions that many hospital administrators and staff had never faced before."
The study group identified a number of decision-making difficulties affecting both SARS and non-SARS patients.
To what extent should the need to contain the outbreak override other important needs? In early stages of the outbreak, the hospital suspended all surgery and banned visitations, causing considerable hardship to the most seriously ill non-SARS patients and their families; and
To what extent should the need for quick decisions override the need for legitimate and fair decision making? Upon resumption of normal hospital operations, there was considerable pressure to move quickly to ease the surgical backlog.
The group's report, published today by U.K.-based Biomed Central, concludes that "in the midst of a crisis such as SARS where guidance is incomplete, consequences uncertain and information constantly changing, where hour-by-hour decisions involve life and death, fairness is more important rather than less."
The hospital's decision making practices were evaluated using the "accountability for reasonableness" ethical framework, developed by the JCB to guide fair priority setting in health care organizations. Under this framework, an institution's priority setting is judged fair if four conditions are met:
Relevance: Rationales for priority setting decisions must rest on rea
Contact: Terry Collins
University of Toronto Joint Center for Bioethics 19-Dec-2004Page: 1 2 3 4 Related medicine news :1
. Balancing care decisions for gravely ill patients2
. How the stories of ordinary people could give them more say over planning decisions3
. Web-based tool to help clinicians make schizophrenia treatment decisions4
. Concerns about fertility affect treatment decisions in one-third of young breast cancer patients5
. European study highlights frequency of medical end-of-life decisions in terminally ill pts6
. Brain imaging study reveals interplay of thought and emotion in economic decisions7
. Peer pressure matters in young adults smoking decisions8
. Computerized tool predicts sarcoma outcome and improves ability to make better treatment decisions9
. Genetics important in age-related macular degeneration10
. Reducing hostility in young coronary artery disease patients is important piece of rehabilitation11
. Molecule important in cell construction also critical in learning and memory