Strong evidence shows that higher taxes, restrictions on alcohol availability, and random breath-testing for drivers could reduce Europe's growing burden of alcohol-related harm, which causes at least 115 000 deaths every year. However, moves by European governments to weaken alcohol-control measures--as, for example, the UK has done by relaxing licensing laws--ignore this evidence and instead pander to vested interests in free trade and industry, states the Editorial.

Under the rules of the common market, EU member states cannot discriminate against products from another European country on the grounds of health, which limits their freedom to design health-protecting tax laws. The ()15 billion of subsidies channeled to alcohol producers through the common agricultural policy is a further complication for prioritising health in EU law. The Lancet believes that these inflexible structures undermine national alcohol-control policies and contribute to social harm.

The Lancet comments: "The two central tenets of alcohol policy currently favoured by the EU's politicians--public education and self regulation by the alcoholic-beverage industry--are, the evidence shows, a costly waste of timeAs long as negotiations over alcohol policy are dominated by the vested interests of free trade and industry--under the spurious banner of personal choice--governments in the EU will continue to shirk their moral obligations to protect their populations from the preventable risk of alcohol-related harm."

'"/>

Contact: Joe Santangelo
j.santangelo@elsevier.com
212-633-3810
Lancet
8-Jun-2006