A theoretical study reveals that in-vitro fertilisation is less costly and more cost-effective than intra-uterine insemination, for the treatment of infertility in couples with unexplained infertility or mild male factor subfertility. In a study published today in the open access journal BMC Health Services Research, researchers use a mathematical model to show that offering a full cycle of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) is better value for money for couples and tax-payers than offering multiple cycles of intra-uterine insemination (IUI), followed by IVF if IUI fails. IUI is the treatment currently recommended by the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) for unexplained infertility and male factor subfertility. Although it is cheaper than IVF, IUI requires many more attempts and often fails to result in pregnancy, forcing couples to undergo an IVF cycle after many attempts at IUI.

Nora Pashayan from the Institute of Public Health in Cambridge, UK, collaborated with colleagues to build a mathematical model that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of IVF and that of IUI, followed by IVF if IUI fails. They evaluated the cost of treatment for 100 simulated couples with unexplained infertility and mild male factor subfertility.

Pashayan et al.'s results show that, as IVF is more efficient and more likely to result in pregnancy after the first trial, offering IVF first is more cost-effective than offering IUI alone, or than offering IUI followed by IVF if IUI fails. The amount of money saved if IVF were offered first instead of unstimulated IUI, the least expensive of IUI treatments, would amount to 174,200. This amount of money could pay for IVF treatments for an additional 54 couples.

'"/>

Contact: Juliette Savin
juliette.savin@biomedcentral.com
44-207-631-9931
BioMed Central
22-Jun-2006

Page: 1
Related medicine news :

1. Osteoporosis screening and treatment may be cost-effective for selected older men
2. Nepalese researchers identify cost-effective treatment for drug-resistant typhoid
3. Expert centers prove cost-effective in managing ovarian cancer
4. Circumcision for prevention of HIV: new analysis demonstrates cost-effectiveness
5. Enhanced depression care may be cost-effective for employers
6. Acupuncture relieves low back pain and is cost-effective
7. Water fluoridation still a cost-effective preventive measure
8. Patient self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy cost-effective
9. New osteoporosis medication not cost-effective compared with older, cheaper drug
10. Use of breast MRI can be cost-effective for some women at high-risk of breast cancer
11. BCG vaccination is highly cost-effective