Cochlear implants allow the deaf to hear. Their brains learn to understand the artificial electrical stimulation that the implants provide to the cochlea as sound. A Stanford neurobiologist teamed with child-development specialists at the University of Maryland to see if children with cochlear implants were able to meld their newly acquired hearing capability with their ability to read lips. In other words, did their brains process speech the same way as people who are born with the ability to hear?
In the Dec. 5 online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers discuss how they used a simple auditory test and found that some children with cochlear implants fuse the visual and auditory aspects of speech - just like people with normal hearing. But the effect was only seen in children who received their implants before the age of 30 months, adding to the body of evidence suggesting that the earlier a hearing-impaired child receives a cochlear implant, the better.
"I see this as a fascinating experiment that reveals the tremendous capacity for plasticity in the developing brain," said Eric Knudsen, PhD, the paper's senior author and the Edward C. and Amy H. Sewall Professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine.
Most people don't appreciate that speech is a product of both hearing and vision, explained Knudsen, who is also chair of Stanford's Department of Neurobiology. The brain has learned that in conversation, the lips and face make certain gestures that always occur together with certain sounds. "The brain is always combining what it sees with what it hears and making the best guess at what was said," he said. In most situations, hearing speech alone is just fine - that's why we can talk on telephones. But in noisy situations, when hearing is poor, our brains rely heavily on lip and facial movements to figure out what someone is saying.
Knudsen has a long history of studying the ability ofPage: 1 2 3 Related medicine news :1
Contact: Mitzi Baker
Stanford University Medical Center
. Conventional prognostic factors fail to explain better prostate cancer survival in most Asian men2
. Waist-to-hip ratio may better predict cardiovascular risk than body mass index3
. Warfarin better than aspirin at stroke prevention in elderly people with atrial fibrillation4
. Nonsmall cell lung cancer -- chemotherapy before surgery appears better than surgery alone5
. Stroke in nonvascular atrial fibrillation -- anti-coagulants better than anti-platelet therapy6
. Holograms make for better vision tests7
. Parents of chronically ill kids are helped by better access to federal and employer leave8
. Diabetes professionals join forces to identify gaps in diabetes care and better self care9
. Exploring better ways to determine when to change the course of treatment10
. Gene variations point to why lung cancer drugs work better in Japanese vs. US patients11
. More rib fractures, but better survival rates