'Wait-and-see' approach for treating ear infections substantially reduces use of a...( For children with acute ear infections...)

'Wait-and-see' approach for treating ear infections substantially reduces use of antibiotics

For children with acute ear infections seen in an emergency department, giving parents the option of delaying use of antibiotics resulted in significantly lower use of antibiotics compared to parents who received a standard prescription, with little difference in the outcomes for the children, according to a study in the September 13 issue of JAMA.

Acute otitis media (AOM; ear infection) is the most common reason for which an antibiotic is prescribed to children. Treatment of AOM accounts for an estimated 15 million antibiotic prescriptions written per year in the United States, according to background information in the article. Untreated AOM has a high rate of natural resolution, with similar rates of complications whether antibiotics are prescribed or withheld. Resistance to antibiotics is a major public health concern worldwide and is associated with the widespread use of antibiotics.

David M. Spiro, M.D., M.P.H., formerly of the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., and colleagues conducted a study to determine whether treatment of AOM using a "wait-and-see prescription" (WASP) significantly reduced use of antibiotics compared with a "standard prescription" (SP), and evaluated the effects of this intervention on clinical symptoms and adverse outcomes. Overall, 283 children with AOM aged 6 months to 12 years seen in an emergency department were randomly assigned to receive either a WASP (n = 138) or a SP (n = 145). All patients received ibuprofen and ear analgesic drops for use at home. Phone interviews were conducted after enrollment to determine outcomes. The trial was conducted between July 2004 and July 2005.

The researchers found that the WASP significantly reduced the use of antibiotics. Substantially more parents in the WASP group did not fill the antibiotic prescription, compared to the SP group (62 percent vs. 13 percent). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the frequency
'"/>

Contact: Tamara Hargens
503-494-8653
JAMA and Archives Journals
12-Sep-2006

Page: 1 2
Related medicine news :

1. Patient-centered approach can backfire
2. Report calls for new directions, innovative approaches in testing chemicals for toxicity to humans
3. Clinical review -- A psychological approach to the management of irritable bowel syndrome
4. Rosiglitazone -- Seeking a balanced approach to avoid panic among patients
5. Treatment of kidney condition requires an individualized approach
6. Mayo Clinic study finds heart transplant patients benefit from new approach to immunosuppression
7. Penn study on lung-infecting bacterial enzyme suggests new approach to cystic fibrosis treatment
8. Combined imaging approach may provide better identification of difficult-to-diagnose brain clots
9. AHA statement recommends doctors change approach
10. Penn addiction researcher presents talk on promising approaches in the treatment of drug addiction
11. New data supports a non-invasive approach to routine prenatal genetic testing

Post Your Comments: